Toyota Hilux Double Cab 2.4E (AT) 4×4 vs Ford Ranger 2.0L XL (AT) 4×4 Specification Comparison

The Toyota Hilux Double Cab 2.4E (AT) is Malaysia’s benchmark workhorse, offering legendary long-term reliability, proven 2.4L 2GD-FTV durability, and strong residual resale value, while the Ford Ranger 2.0L XL (AT) counters with a more powerful 2.0L Single-Turbo engine (170 PS / 405 Nm), lower annual road tax, a modern 10.1-inch SYNC 4A touchscreen with wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, and 6 standard airbags.

Quick Verdict:

  • Choose the Toyota Hilux Double Cab 2.4E (AT) if: You prioritize unmatched mechanical durability, low maintenance overhead, easy spare parts availability, and high long-term resale value for heavy commercial or off-road duty.
  • Choose the Ford Ranger 2.0L XL (AT) if: You want higher engine performance (170 PS), modern cabin technology (10.1-inch portrait screen with wireless CarPlay), 6 airbags standard, a smoother unladen ride, and lower annual road tax.

💰 Estimated Monthly Ownership Breakdown

Cost FactorToyota Hilux Double Cab 2.4E (AT)Ford Ranger 2.0L XL (AT)
Price (OTR w/o Insurance)RM 119,880RM 114,888 – RM 118,888
Annual Road Tax (Peninsular MY)~RM 754~RM 395
Warranty Package5 Years / 150,000 km5 Years / 160,000 km
Wheel Size17-inch Alloy Wheels (265/65 R17)16-inch Alloy Wheels (255/70 R16)
Est. Monthly Loan (9-Yr @ 3%)~RM 1,268/mo~RM 1,215/mo – ~RM 1,258/mo

📊 Comprehensive Specification Comparison

Feature / SpecToyota Hilux Double Cab 2.4E (AT) 4×4Ford Ranger 2.0L XL (AT) 4×4
Body Style / LayoutDouble Cab Pickup (4×4)Double Cab Pickup (4×4)
AssemblyCKD (Local Assembly, Malaysia)CBU (Imported, Thailand)
Engine Type2.4L 4-Cylinder 16V VNT Turbodiesel (2GD-FTV)2.0L 4-Cylinder Single-Turbo Diesel (EcoBlue)
Displacement2,393 cc1,996 cc
Transmission6-Speed Automatic with Super ECT & Sequential Shifter6-Speed Automatic (6R80)
4×4 Drivetrain SystemPart-time 4WD with ADD & Rear Diff LockPart-time 4WD with Shift-on-the-Fly (2H/4H/4L)
Max Power Output150 PS (148 hp) @ 3,400 RPM170 PS (168 hp) @ 3,500 RPM
Max Torque400 Nm @ 1,600–2,000 RPM405 Nm @ 1,750–2,500 RPM
Dimensions (L x W x H)5,325 mm x 1,855 mm x 1,815 mm5,370 mm x 1,918 mm x 1,884 mm
Wheelbase3,085 mm3,270 mm
Ground Clearance286 mm230 mm
Kerb Weight2,080 kg~2,220 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity80 Litres80 Litres
Front / Rear BrakesVentilated Discs / Rear DrumsVentilated Discs / Rear Drums
Suspension (Front / Rear)Double Wishbone / Heavy-Duty Leaf SpringsDouble Wishbone / Leaf Springs
Infotainment Screen2-DIN Head Unit (CD/MP3/Bluetooth) (Optional Touchscreen upgrade)10.1-inch Portrait Touchscreen with SYNC 4A
Smartphone ConnectivityBluetooth & USBWireless Apple CarPlay & Android Auto
Instrument DisplayAnalog Gauges with Multi-Info Display8.0-inch Digital Instrument Cluster Display
Airbags3 SRS Airbags (Driver, Passenger, Driver Knee)6 SRS Airbags (Driver, Passenger, Side, Curtain)
Stability & Safety TechVSC, TRC, HAC, ABS, EBD, Brake AssistESC, TCS, HLA, HDC, ABS, EBD, Emergency Brake Assist

⚡ Key Differences Breakdown

🚗 Powertrain, Performance & Road Tax

  • Toyota Hilux 2.4E (AT):Powered by the 2.4L 2GD-FTV turbodiesel engine producing 150 PS and 400 Nm of torque.Paired with a 6-speed Super ECT automatic gearbox, it delivers reliable torque delivery. Annual road tax is higher due to its 2.4-litre displacement.
  • Ford Ranger 2.0L XL (AT): Powered by a 2.0L Single-Turbo EcoBlue diesel engine producing 170 PS and 405 Nm of torque. The smaller 2.0-litre displacement results in significantly lower annual road tax while providing higher engine horsepower.

🎨 Vehicle Stance, Dimensions & Chassis

  • Toyota Hilux 2.4E (AT):Features an overall length of 5,325 mm, a 3,085 mm wheelbase, and 17-inch alloy wheels fitted with 265/65 R17 all-terrain tyres. It uses a stiffer rear leaf spring setup optimized for heavy payloads.
  • Ford Ranger 2.0L XL (AT):Measures longer (5,370 mm) and wider (1,918 mm) with an extended 3,270 mm wheelbase, giving it a larger road presence and improved high-speed stability.It rides on 16-inch alloy wheels.

🛋️ Cabin Tech, Comfort & Safety Equipment

  • Toyota Hilux 2.4E (AT):Comes standard with a basic 2-DIN audio setup (6 speakers), manual single-zone air-conditioning, fabric seating, and 3 airbags (driver, front passenger, and driver knee).
  • Ford Ranger 2.0L XL (AT): Upgrades standard interior features with a 10.1-inch portrait touchscreen running Ford’s SYNC 4A system, supporting wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. It includes an 8-inch digital driver instrument display and 6 airbags.
  • Zakirin

    All this talk about luxury car just so we get to buy overpriced coffee in style

    Related Posts

    Toyota Hilux 2.8 GR Sport vs Ford Ranger Full-Spec (Platinum 3.0 V6 / Raptor 3.0 V6) Specification Comparison

    Comparing the range-topping Toyota Hilux 2.8 GR Sport (RM 173,280) against Ford’s flagship offerings—the luxury-focused Ford Ranger Platinum 3.0 V6 (RM 205,888) and the high-performance Ford Ranger Raptor 3.0 V6…

    Continue reading
    Proton e.MAS 7 Prime vs Perodua QV-E Specification Comparison

    The Proton e.MAS 7 Prime is a full-sized C-segment electric SUV built on Geely’s GEA platform offering 218 PS performance, a larger 461-litre boot, 11 kW AC charging, and a…

    Continue reading

    More Articles

    Toyota Hilux 2.8 GR Sport vs Ford Ranger Full-Spec (Platinum 3.0 V6 / Raptor 3.0 V6) Specification Comparison

    • By Zakirin
    • August 11, 2026
    • 34 views
    Toyota Hilux 2.8 GR Sport vs Ford Ranger Full-Spec (Platinum 3.0 V6 / Raptor 3.0 V6) Specification Comparison

    Toyota Hilux Double Cab 2.4E (AT) 4×4 vs Ford Ranger 2.0L XL (AT) 4×4 Specification Comparison

    • By Zakirin
    • August 11, 2026
    • 39 views
    Toyota Hilux Double Cab 2.4E (AT) 4×4 vs Ford Ranger 2.0L XL (AT) 4×4 Specification Comparison

    PRO-NET and TVETMARA Certify 37 Level 2 EV Technicians

    • By Zakirin
    • August 11, 2026
    • 38 views
    PRO-NET and TVETMARA Certify 37 Level 2 EV Technicians

    Proton e.MAS 7 Prime vs Perodua QV-E Specification Comparison

    • By Zakirin
    • August 11, 2026
    • 54 views
    Proton e.MAS 7 Prime vs Perodua QV-E Specification Comparison

    Proton e.MAS 5 Premium vs Perodua QV-E Specification Comparison

    • By Zakirin
    • August 11, 2026
    • 50 views
    Proton e.MAS 5 Premium vs Perodua QV-E Specification Comparison

    Inokom Opens RM300 Million Paint Shop 3 Facility in Kulim

    • By Zakirin
    • August 11, 2026
    • 47 views
    Inokom Opens RM300 Million Paint Shop 3 Facility in Kulim

    Chery Malaysia Opens Relocated 3S Centre in Alor Setar

    • By Zakirin
    • August 11, 2026
    • 49 views
    Chery Malaysia Opens Relocated 3S Centre in Alor Setar

    BMW Group Malaysia and Universiti Malaya Deploy Solar-Powered Device Charging Station Using Repurposed EV Batteries

    • By Zakirin
    • August 11, 2026
    • 43 views
    BMW Group Malaysia and Universiti Malaya Deploy Solar-Powered Device Charging Station Using Repurposed EV Batteries

    2026 Perodua QV-E Maintenance Costs Revealed: RM1.4k Over 5 Years

    • By Zakirin
    • August 8, 2026
    • 88 views
    2026 Perodua QV-E Maintenance Costs Revealed: RM1.4k Over 5 Years

    “My Toys”: Inside Cristiano Ronaldo’s Staggering Supercar Empire

    • By Zakirin
    • August 8, 2026
    • 88 views
    “My Toys”: Inside Cristiano Ronaldo’s Staggering Supercar Empire